Explaining the clause

I can explain how the selling rights clause works, particularly why Madrid might refuse it. Selling rights gives Madrid leverage to either sign Kubo at a lower price or profit from a future sale, while Real Sociedad buying out would remove that benefit. I should provide this context in a clear analysis rather than asserting current details. I could ask if the user wants sources or if they prefer a quick explanation versus checking latest reports.Explaining Kubo’s rights

I’ll start by giving a quick background on Kubo’s rights between Real Madrid and Real Sociedad, explaining the meaning of a "buyout of sell-on." I should outline three reasons why Real Madrid might refuse this buyout and discuss its implications for potential transfers. For example, if another club bids, Madrid stands to gain 50% from that transfer. However, the nuances of release clauses in Spain mean that this 50% sell-on might not always apply if the clause is triggered.Clarifying Kubo's situation

To avoid any errors, I can say that reports suggest the effective price for Madrid might be lowered, with the exact mechanics depending on the contract language. Overall, Madrid retains leverage since it reportedly has a 50% share of future sale rights and first refusal.

I can summarize the context in concise bullets and offer to find the latest articles for the user. I'll also ask if they want verification of specific reports or just a simple explanation.